By week:
|
Here is the plan as we see it now, it is, of course, subject to
revision as the course progresses.
Problem 1 - The Eddington Luminosity 
There is a natural limit to the luminosity a gravitationally bound
object can emit. At this limit the inward gravitational force on a
piece of material is balanced by the outgoing radiation pressure.
Although this limiting luminosity, the Eddington luminosity, can be evaded
in various ways, it can provide a useful (if not truly firm) estimate
of the minimum mass of a particular source of radiation.
-
Consider ionized hydrogen gas. Each electron-proton pair has a mass
more or less equal to the mass of the proton (mp)
and a cross section to radiation equal to the Thompson cross-section
(σT).
-
The radiation pressure is given by outgoing radiation flux over the speed
of light.
-
Equate the outgoing force due to radiation on the pair with the inward force
of gravity on the pair.
- Solve for the luminosity as a function of mass.
The mass of the sun is 2 x 1033 g. What is the Eddington
luminosity of the sun?
Problem 2 - Minimum Masses 
The observations of Sco X-1 can give a
lower limit on the mass of the sources if they are gravitationally bound.
The source discovered by Giacconi et al. is now known as Sco X-1.
- What is the most likely distance to Sco X-1 given its location on the
sky?
-
At this distance given the flux estimate in the Giacconi et al., what
is the luminosity of Sco X-1?
-
What is the minimum mass of Sco X-1?
The distance to Sco X-1 is still not well determined.
Problem 1 - Spinning Neutron Stars 
We will estimate how quickly we would expect neutron stars to spin, how
much energy is stored in their spin and other interesting facts about spinning
neutron stars.
-
The sun rotates every 24-30 days depending on latitude. How quickly would it
rotate if it were compressed to 10km in radius while conserving its angular momentum? Its current radius is 7 x 1010 cm.
-
How fast could a neutron star rotate without breaking up? Consider the neutron
star to be 1.4
and have a radius of 10 km and compare the
centripetal acceleration of a bit of material on the surface to the
gravitational acceleration.
-
How much angular momentum and rotational energy does a neutron star have? Use
and a spin period of break-up, 1.6 ms, 33 ms and 6 s.
Problem 2 - Original Spin 
If you know the age of a neutron star, its current period and its period
derivative, you can estimate its original spin.
-
Using the results from the lectures, derive a formula for P0 in terms
of the age, current period and period derivative of a pulsar.
-
The table below lists pulsars that are associated with historical supernovae.
Complete the table by calculating the original spin of these neutron stars.
Name |
Age [yr] |
Period [s] |
P-dot [10-15 s s-1] |
P0 [s] |
B0531-21 |
949 |
0.0331 |
422.69 |
|
B0540-69 |
1000 |
0.050 |
480 |
|
B1951+32 |
64000 |
0.0395 |
5.8 |
|
J0205+6449 |
822 |
0.06568 |
193 |
|
-
Why do we know the age of the first and last pulsars so accurately?
Problem 1 - Newtonian Polytropes 
We are going to do some dimensional analysis to understand stars with a
polytropic equation of state, polytropes.
-
Consider a star of mass, M, and radius, R. Construct by dimensional analysis
a characteristic pressure and a characteristic density from these quantities
and Newton's constant, G.
-
A polytropic equation of state is a power-law relationship between pressure
and density, P = K ρα. Substitute the characteristic
pressure and density into the polytropic equation of state to derive a
mass-radius relation.
-
Which values of α have special properties? What are they?
Problem 2 - Central Pressures 
We will calculate the central pressure of a incompressible star in
Newtonian physics and general relativity.
-
Use the General Relativistic equations of hydrostatic equilibrium
to determine the
central pressure of a star of mass M and radius R. The material is
incompressible, i.e. its density is constant. After integrating (9) from the
center where the enclosed mass, u, vanishes, it is easiest to integrate (10)
from the surface where the pressure vanishes. Write your answer as a function
of M and R by eliminating the constant density from the result.
-
By dimensional analysis, figure out where the factors of G and c appear in
the General Relativistic equations of hydrostatic equilibrium.
-
Derive the Newtonian equations of hydrostatic equilibrium by taking the limit
of c → ∞.
-
Redo the pressure calculation in Newtonian physics.
-
By dimensional analysis, figure out where the factors of G and c appear in
your answer to (1).
-
Check your answers by taking the limit of c → ∞ for your answer
to (5) and comparing it with the answer to (4).
-
What is the minimal radius for a constant-density star
of a given mass? What is the maximal mass for a star of a particular density?
What is the maximal mass for a star at nuclear density, 1015 g cm-3?
Problem 3 - Neutron Star Masses 
Calculate from dimensional analysis the typical mass of a neutron star.
-
Use the characteristic density and pressure of a star that you derived in Problem 1.
Neutron stars have relativistic neutrons so the pressure is about the density times
c2. Use this to derive a relationship between the mass and radius of the
star.
-
A relativistic degenerate gas has a density of one particle in a cube a Compton wavelength
on a side. Combine this with the result from Part 1 to solve for the mass of the star.
Problem 1 - Thermodynamics and General Relativity 
In general relativity if two bodies are in thermodynamic equilibrium,
We can exploit this relationship along with Kirchoff's law to derive some
interesting facts about how light travels from a neutron star to our
telescopes. You can experiment with neutron-star lensing with
this Java Applet.
-
Because everything is in thermodynamic equilibrium, we can safely
assume that the neutron star of mass M and radius R emits as a
blackbody at a temperature T. Calculate the total power emitted
from the neutron star surface in the frame of the neutron star
surface.
-
Calculate the total power received at infinity. Let the redshift of the
surface be z.
-
Let the space surrounding the star be filled with blackbody radiation
in thermal equilibrium with the surface of the neutron star. You can
imagine that the neutron star is in a gigantic thermos bottle.
Let T∞ be the temperature of this blackbody radiation
measured at infinity (i.e. z=0). What is T∞?
Now here comes Kirchoff's law: in thermodynamic equilibrium a body emits as
much as it receives.
-
How much power does the neutron star absorb from the blackbody at infinity?
This is the product of the surface area of the neutron star with the flux
per unit area of the blackbody radiation.
A conundrum: compare the answer to (2) with the answer to (4). They differ.
Does the neutron star cool down because (2) is greater than (4)?
The neutron star can't cool down because it is already in equilibrium, so one
of our assumptions must be wrong.
-
It turns out that the most innocuous sounding assumption is incorrect. The power that the neutron star absorbs is the product of its apparent surface area
with the flux per unit area of the blackbody radiation.
Let the apparent radius be R∞ and recalculate the answer
to (4).
-
Equate (2) and (5) and solve for R∞.
R∞ ≠ R because in the vicinity of a neutron star light does
not travel in a straight line. One can also derive the value of
R∞ by solving for a null geodesic that is tangent to the
surface of the neutron star.
-
What is the minimum value of R∞ for a constant value of M? You
will need to know that
1+z = |
1 (1 - 2 G M/R c2)1/2 |
What is the value of R? Call this radius Rγ.
-
Prove the size of the image of the neutron star must decrease or remain the
same as the radius of the neutron star decreases. Use the fact that rays
that we ultimately see remain outgoing throughout their journey to us
(otherwise by symmetry they would hit the surface a second time).
-
What happens to the size of the image of the star if the radius of the star
is less that Rγ?
-
The calculation of the apparent radius of the star from thermodynamics
hinges on the assumption that the outgoing flux from the surface
reaches infinity. For R < Rγ, the size of the image
no longer increases while thermodynamics says it should, so we must
conclude that for radii less than Rγ initially
outgoing photons can become incoming photons.
From these arguments and spherical symmetry speculate what might happen to a
photon emitted precisely at Rγ tangentially, i.e. neither
ingoing or outgoing.
-
Calculate how much radiation a star whose radius is less
than Rγ will absorb.
The answer to (11) falls short of (2) again. We know that the star
can't heat up, so an assumption must be wrong. Within Rγ
not every photon emitted can escape to infinity, many photons
return and hit the surface.
-
Using the answers to (2) and (11), calculate the fraction of the
outgoing photon flux emitted from the surface that manages to escape.
-
Use the fact that a blackbody emits isotropically to determine the
opening angle of the cone into which the escaping photons are emitted.
This region is symmetric around the radial direction.
-
Pat yourself on the back. You have derived many of the quirky things about
the Schwarschild metric (the metric that surrounds a spherically symmetric
mass distribution). List the key assumptions that you have made to
make this derivation work.
Problem 2 - Light-Envelope Neutron-Star Cooling 
The presence of hydrogen in the atmosphere of a neutron star strongly affects
the emission of the surface of the star and possibly how the star cools.
-
Calculate the maximum possible density of pure degenerate ionized
hydrogen gas (non-degenerate protons and degenerate electrons). What
happens above this density?
-
Assume that the electrons dominate the pressure, what is the pressure at
this critical density?
-
Assume that the gravitational acceleration is constant in this thin layer
and is given by gs,141014 cm s-2. What is
the column density of the layer?
- Assume that the stellar radius is
R6 106 cm.
How much hydrogen can you pile onto a neutron star?
-
Assume that the cross section to x-rays per electron-proton pair
is given by the Thomson cross-section. What is the column density
of an optically thick layer of hydrogen (τ=1)?
-
The conductivity of the surface layers of a neutron star is inversely
proportional to the atomic number of the nuclei. How does the
surface luminosity of neutron star change if you pour hydrogen
onto its surface?
Problem 1 - Accretion 
-
Let's use Newtonian gravity for simplicity here. How much kinetic
energy does a gram of material have if it falls freely from infinity to the
surface of a star of mass M and radius R?
-
How much energy is released if a gram of material falls from a circular orbit
just above the stellar surface onto the stellar surface?
To put it another way, what is the kinetic energy of the material in the circular orbit?
-
Hydrogen burning releases about 6 x 1018 erg/g. How does
accretion of hydrogen onto a neutron star (R=10km,
M=1.4
) differ
from accretion onto a white dwarf (R=10000 km,
M=0.6 )?
-
What is the total about of energy released per gram of material as it falls
from infinity to the surface of a neutron star? How many grams of material
would have to fall each second on the neutron star to generate an Eddington
luminosity through accretion? This is called the Eddington accretion rate.
Problem 2 - Bursts 
We will try to model Type-I X-ray bursts using a simple model for the
instability. We will calculate how much material will accumulate on
a neutron star before it bursts.
-
Let us assume that the star accretes pure helium, that the temperature
of the degenerate layer is constant down to the core (Tc), how
much luminosity emerges from the surface of the star? (You shouldn't have
to derive this formula (I gave it to you in class).
-
Let us assume that the helium layer has a mass, dM, and that the enregy
generation rate for helium burning is given by
ε3α = 3.5 x 1020
T9-3
exp(-4.32/T9) erg s-1 g-1
|
where T9=T/109K. The energy generation rate is a
function of density too, but let's forget about that to keep things simple.
How much power does the helium layer generate as a function of dM?
-
Equate your answer to (1) to the answer to (2) and solve for dM. This
is the thickness of a layer in thermal equilibrium.
-
Let's assume that the potential burst starts by the temperature in the
accreted layer jiggling up by a wee bit. If the surface luminosity increases
faster with temperature than the helium burning rate, then the layer is
stable. Calculate dLsurface/dT and dPhelium/dT.
-
Calculate the value of dM for which dPhelium/dT exceeds
dLsurface/dT and the layer bursts.
-
Equate your value of dM in (3) and (5) and solve for T. What is dM?
How
long will it take for such a layer to accumulate if the star is accreting
at one-tenth of the Eddington accretion rate?
Problem 1 - 
Assignment (Due 4 March 2010) Assignment 1
Problem 1 - 
Assignment (Due 9 April 2010) Homework
Last modified: Thursday, 08 April 2010 14:15:28
|