ASTR 304 - 2003W [Week 11]

Navigation BarHome PageSyllabusBibliographyProblem SetsNewsContact Info

By week:

Week 11 - The Gamma-Ray Burst Controversy [10] [12]

Summary

Gamma-ray bursts still are mysterious but they were even more so a few years ago. We will discuss what were the chief paradigms for understanding gamma-ray bursts. We will frame our discussion within the Paczynski-Lamb debate which look place in 1995. Although the discovery of afterglows associated with "long" gamma-ray bursts has advanced our knowledge substantially, the nature of "short" bursts remains elusive.

Reading List

  • ``On the Galactic disk and halo models of gamma-ray bursts''
    [ ADS, PDF ]
    REF: Mao, S., Paczynski, B. 1992, Astrophys. J. Lett., 389, L13-L16 . Top

  • ``On the cosmological origin of gamma-ray bursts''
    [ ADS, PDF ]
    REF: Mao, S., Paczynski, B. 1992, Astrophys. J. Lett., 388, L45-L48 . Top

Problem Set

Problem 1 - Isotropy Top

We are going to explore the galactic model for GRBs a bit.
  1. Suppose that GRBs lie in a spherical distribution of radius R, and we lie a distance R0 away from the center. Furthermore suppose that we can see every GRB in the volume and we have seen a total of N GRBs. How many GRBs will we have seen in the hemisphere of sky toward the center of the distribution versus the opposite hemisphere?
  2. Using the results from number (1), what is the difference in the number of GRBs in each hemisphere to lowest order in R0/R?
  3. Let's compare this result with observations. The one-sigma error in the difference between number of objects in the hemispheres is given by approximately by N1/2. If you have observed N objects without detecting an difference between the two hemispheres at the two-sigma level, what is the minimum acceptable value of R/R0?
  4. At the time of the Paczynski-Lamb debate BATSE had observed about 600 bursts and R0 was assumed to be 10kpc, what was the minimal acceptable value of R at the two-sigma level? Does this distance sound familiar?

Problem 2 - Boosting Top

We are going to figure out how times and energies measured by someone in motion differ from what we might measure.
  1. Use the Minkowski metric to figure this out. I measure a photon to have an energy E. What is the four-momentum of the photon?
  2. My pal is travelling toward me in the opposite direction of the photon at a velocity β c. What is his four-velocity? Use the definition γ = (1-β2)-1/2 to simplify the expression. What energy would he measure for the photon? What does the expression look like as γ gets much larger than one?
  3. If my pal observes the photon to have an energy of 100 MeV while I say its energy is less than 500 keV, what is the minimal value of γ for my pal (take β=1 to make life easier)?
  4. My pal is still coming toward me at a velocity β c. When he is a distance r away from me (at a time t0) he emits a photon toward me. How long does it take this photon to reach me?
  5. From his point of view a short time Δt later he emits another photon toward me. How long is Δt in my frame and when do I receive the second photon? What is the difference in time between when I receive the first and second photons? What does the expression look like as γ gets much larger than one? Compare it with you answer to (2).
  6. Explain two ways that relativistic motion (big values of γ) can relieve the compactness problem.

Problem 3 - Fermi Process Top

My pal and I are going to do something a bit different. We are going to play relativistic tennis.
  1. He is still toward me at a high value of γ. He serves a photon with energy E in his frame toward me. What is its energy when I receive it (take the high γ limit)?
  2. I reflect the photon back toward him with a mirror. What is the energy of the photon in my pal's frame when he receives it again? What is its energy after another complete volley? After n complete volleys?
  3. Let's say that we're not so good and that the probability that we successfully reflect the photon is p where p is much smaller than unity. What is the probability of completing n complete volleys?
  4. Take the logarithm of both sides of the energy of the photon after n complete volleys and solve for n.
  5. Take the logarithm of both sides of the probability of completing n complete volleys and substitute the value of n from the previous part. Rearrange to obtain an expression for the probability as a function of the photon energy -- it should be a power-law.
  6. Take p to be 10-5 (we're not very good) and γ = 100. What is the exponent of the power-law?
In astrophysical shocks, electrons bounce back and forth across the shock gaining energy each time they bounce. Although the analysis here was for relativistic shocks and photons, it can be generalized for non-relativistic and electrons to obtain a similar power-law distribution of energies.
Last modified: Tuesday, 06 April 2004 07:28:12